Quebec creating new system to determine English schooling

Quebec is rebuilding the rules that decide which children may attend an English-language public school, and it is doing so under judicial orders. After a court ruling opened enrolment in English public schools to students who had previously been shut out, the province's parliamentary commission began drafting a replacement for Bill 104, the law the courts had knocked down.

The new instrument is a points-based formula. Rather than a flat prohibition, the province will score each application and decide case by case who qualifies.

The word doing all the work is "authentic"

Under the scheme, parents would have to prove before a provincial tribunal that their child's schooling in English would provide an "authentic" education that could not otherwise be obtained. Francophones and allophones can opt for English as the language of instruction by supplying the province with documentation setting out a "parcours scolaire authentique", an authentic scholarly route.

That is an unusual thing for a state to ask a family to prove. It is not a test of residence, or of citizenship, or of a parent's own schooling. It is a test of sincerity, adjudicated by a tribunal, about a child's educational trajectory. The formula exists to distinguish families whose English schooling is genuine from families who bought their way in, and it puts a bureaucrat in the position of judging which is which.

The loophole being closed

To understand the design, look at the practice it targets. Parents who wanted English public schooling for a child not otherwise eligible would enrol the child briefly in an unsubsidised English private school, then transfer them across, using the private stint as a qualification. Bill 104 tried to block that route and was struck down for going too far.

The replacement takes a different approach. Starting in 2011, children can be moved from an unsubsidised English private school to an English public school only after three years. The bridge still exists. It simply costs three years of private tuition to cross.

The obvious consequence is written into the rule. A three-year private school requirement creates an economic advantage for parents with the financial resources to meet it. A wealthy family can buy the qualification. A working family cannot. What began as a language policy becomes, in practice, a means test.

Where the courts come in

Quebec's language legislation, anchored in the Charter of the French Language, has been litigated for decades, and the province has repeatedly had provisions narrowed or invalidated when they collided with constitutional guarantees. That is the pattern the Bill 104 ruling continued. The province legislates to protect French, a family challenges the restriction, a court finds the measure disproportionate, and Quebec returns with a more finely tuned version.

The points system is the finely tuned version. Instead of a categorical ban that a court can strike in one stroke, it produces a discretionary assessment that is much harder to challenge, because every refusal turns on the individual facts of one child's file.

What Quebec children are taught about English

The irony sitting underneath the fight is that Quebec's francophone system does teach English. Students take English-as-a-second-language classes in elementary school and must satisfy oral and written components by the sixth grade. English is not required beyond the eighth grade.

So the province mandates esl classes and then constrains who may learn in English. Those two positions are consistent only if you accept the distinction the policy rests on: English as a subject is a skill, while English as a medium of instruction is a form of assimilation. Quebec has been operating on that distinction since the 1970s.

Parents who want more than the minimum reach for the alternatives available to them:

  • Unsubsidised private schooling, now with a three-year waiting period attached
  • Additional English tuition outside school hours, paid for privately
  • Moving to another province, which removes the problem entirely
  • Accepting the francophone system and treating English as something acquired later

Life inside a tribunal decision

Consider what the process demands of an ordinary family. A parent who wants an English public school place must assemble a file: report cards, enrolment records, evidence of the child's schooling to date, an account of why English is the route that fits this particular child. The tribunal weighs it and issues points. Somewhere below a threshold the answer is no, and the child stays where they are.

There is no version of this that is not intrusive. The state is inspecting the educational biography of a seven-year-old to determine whether the family's intentions are real. Officials working under quebec language law are being asked to make judgments about authenticity, a concept that resists definition and rewards families who know how to present themselves on paper. Applicants with a lawyer will do better than applicants without one, which is the same inequality the three-year private school rule creates, arriving by a different door.

The argument nobody wins

Both sides of this have a real case. Quebec is a French-speaking society of roughly eight million people on an overwhelmingly English-speaking continent, and it has watched what happens to minority languages that stop being the language of schooling. The pressure it is resisting is not imaginary.

Equally, parents pointing to the research on bilingual education are not inventing an advantage. Children who grow up working in two languages do gain something, and telling a family that their child may not access an English school because of a tribunal's view of their motives is a heavy use of state power.

The points formula does not resolve that conflict. It converts it into paperwork, moves it into a tribunal, and makes the outcome depend on how well a family can document a story about their child's education. The Supreme Court of Canada has been the referee in this contest before, and the design of the new law suggests Quebec expects to be back.